Consumer Supporter News
November, 1999
Get
Out the Vote!:
NCSTAC Providing Assistance To Mental Health Consumers
By Ellen Alderton,
NCSTAC Education Specialist
42 million individuals would constitute a tremendous voting block, and
this is precisely how many American adults the National Institutes of
Health estimate to be mental health consumers. The National Consumer Supporter
Technical Assistance Center is now launching a nation-wide effort to get
these consumers to the polls for the year 2,000 elections.
"We are excited and privileged to be spearheading this national initiative,"
says Catherine Huynh, NCSTAC project director. "So many mental health
consumers are under the mistaken impression that they are not allowed
to vote. We want to put out the message that voting is a constitutional
right that we all share."
Many obstacles have lead to the virtual disenfranchisement of individuals
with psychiatric diagnoses: Often, mental health consumers incorrectly
believe that they are not allowed to vote. In reality, only those very
few people who have specifically been deemed mentally incompetent by a
court may not vote. Other consumers, even those currently living in mental
institutions, may exercise their constitutional right to participate in
elections.
NCSTAC will be offering various regional training programs around the
country. At these programs, participants will learn how to train leaders
in their own states in how to set up voter empowerment programs. The training
programs will cover conducting research on registration rules in your
home state, finding and registering consumers - including the homeless
and the institutionalized, educating consumers about candidates and issues
in a non-partisan manner, maintaining a registrant database, reminding
consumers when the election date is approaching, and arranging for voters
to get to the polls.
"Fortunately," says Ms. Huynh, "we will be able to offer some scholarships
for leaders from consumer organizations to take part in these workshops.
We plan the workshops to be 'train-the-trainer' scenarios, where the participants
will go home and educate other leaders in how to run voter empower campaigns.
We hope to reach as many people as possible in this way."
Originally, the Voter Empowerment Project started as a one-man crusade
championed by Ken Steele of New York State. When newly-developed medications
allowed Mr. Steele relief in his long-time struggle with schizophrenia,
he became determined not only to participate as a full citizen in the
American electoral process but also to assist other consumers to take
part as well. In four years of running his program, Mr. Steele has registered
over 27,000 mental health consumers in New York.
Participants of the National Voter Empowerment train-the-trainer workshops
will receive a video chronicling Steele's story, together with other educational
materials to share with their own trainees. Those interested either in
taking part in the national train-the-trainer sessions or in learning
how to launch voter outreach programs in their own areas should contact
NCSTAC.
A
Coalition Grows in the Nation's Capitol
by Ellen Alderton,
NCSTAC Education Specialist
Forming a coalition of ten disparate groups with often widely varying
agendas isn't easy, but this is exactly what NAMI DC and the DC Mental
Health Consumers' League have set out to do. "I don't even want to say
that this will be challenging," says NAMI DC Program Officer, Nancy Lee
Head, "because that is so obvious."
According to Ms. Head, the coalition's single most important goal will
be "to try to help people to move beyond their own personal issues to
find a common agenda without losing their own identity and focus." That
common agenda entails advocating together to address the fragmentation
of mental health services and the other systemic needs for reform in the
District of Columbia.
"We will need to educate ourselves about each other's agendas," says Head.
"Those of us in NAMI and in the Consumers' League, for example, know very
little about children's issues. But we will have to learn and be able
to speak up on this issue so that we can support FASA (the Family Advocacy
and Support Association) intelligently."
NAMI DC and the DC Mental Health Consumers' League are recipients of one
of five mini-grants, each totaling eight thousand dollars, that have been
awarded by NCSTAC for the 1999 fiscal year Coalitions for Community Care
project. With their funding, NAMI DC and the DC Mental Health Consumers'
League intend to expand a current coalition of six local mental health
organizations to include four more groups.
The other four members of the current coalition are the Family Advocacy
and Support Association, Friends of Saint Elizabeths Hospital, the Mental
Health Association of the District of Columbia and Schizophrenics Anonymous.
Additional groups that the coalition wishes to reach out to include newly-forming
organizations in D.C.'s Latino community.
Community
Living Succeeds in Oregon
by Cecilia Vergaretti,
Executive Director, MHA of Oregon
Earlier this year, the Mental Health Association of Oregon won an $8,000
mini-grant as part of NCSTAC's Coalitions for Community Care initiative.
The grant proposal came out of a decision to bring the PACT model (Program
of Assertive Community Treatment) of treatment to Oregon. While the principles
of Assertive Community Treatment are seen by some to increase the empowerment
of consumers and the flexibility of service providers, the Mental Health
Association of Oregon has concerns about the coercive elements of PACT.
In November, the Oregon Office of Mental Health Services is sponsoring
a conference to focus on a variety of existing treatment models. Our project
will look to build upon the momentum of this conference and will work
to build consensus about the concept of Successful Community Living and
about what consumers think are the best ways to achieve this goal.
A guiding principle of the Mental Health Association of Oregon is that
people who use mental health services must enjoy the maximum possible
control over the services they receive. Accordingly, the first step in
this project will be to create a Consumer Advisory Committee which will
guide the project. Once this committee is developed, other groups (family
members, providers, representatives of managed care and community mental
health programs) will be invited to the table to begin consensus- building.
We believe this project will help put the spotlight on what works best
for consumers in the least coercive fashion. Ultimately, we hope that
the consensus-building process will help us pull together a coalition
of folks who will be able to convince the State Office of Mental Health
Services, local mental health providers, and the state legislature that
Successful Community Living is possible with the right types of adequately
funded services.
Consumer/Survivor
Conferences Keep the Movement Focused
by Brian Coopper,
NMHA Director of Consumer Advocacy
Three recent gatherings of recipients and survivors of mental health services
have served to keep both the national and international mental health
consumer/survivor movements energized. The first was the National Summit
of Mental Health Consumers and Survivors, held August 26-29 in Portland,
Oregon. Just one week later, the 1999 World Congress of the World Federation
for Mental Health (WFMH) in Santiago, Chile was the gathering point for
the World Network of Users and Survivors of Psychiatry. Finally, the annual
Alternatives conference took place in Houston, Texas from October 20 through
the 24th.
Both meetings were very successful. At the Summit, over 450 consumers
and survivors met to develop consensus on a series of 12 platform "planks."
Sponsored by the National Mental Health Consumers' Self-Help Clearinghouse,
this meeting involved a lot of hard work by all of the participants. The
feeling of camaraderie and sharing that evolved made participation at
the Summit a truly moving event for virtually everybody who was there.
Many thanks to Joseph Rogers and Marie Verna of the Clearinghouse for
having the vision and organization to bring us together in this very productive
Summit. The reports from the platform planks are still being finalized
but should be available soon through www.mhselfhelp.org
At the World Congress of the WFMH in Santiago, 14 consumer/survivors from
the United States on scholarship from the U.S. Center for Mental Health
Services joined with users and survivors from other countries to attend
this biennial conference. (Note: The term "consumer" is used in North
America and Australia, but most other regions of the world employ the
term "user.")
Attendees met every day at lunch time and developed action plans for formalizing
the organization of the World Network of Users and Survivors of Psychiatry
(WNUSP). An Interim Committee was created, and Maria Mar (mariamar@neteze.com)
was elected as the representative for North America. Enough money was
collected from the attendees to cover the dues for two years to the WFMH,
so the WNUSP will be a voting member at the next World Congress in 2001
in Vancouver, British Columbia. A final report is expected later this
year that consolidates the individual reports of each of the scholarship
recipients, and the intent is to post that report on the Internet as well.
Also of note from the World Congress in Chile: Sylvia Caras, psychiatric
survivor and webmaster of www.peoplewho.net,
was elected to the Board of Directors of the WFMH. Congratulations, Sylvia!
Another meeting in the U.S. this fall capped off the work of consumers
and survivors from the Summit and the World Congress. Houston, Texas saw
the last Alternatives conference of the millennium. Sponsored by the Consumer
Organization and Networking Technical Assistance Center (www.contac.org),
it was aptly named, too: "The New Millennium: Looking Backward, Moving
Forward." 1999 has certainly been a big year for the focusing of consumer/survivor
involvement on both the national and international levels, and 2000 promises
nothing less!
NMHA
Leads the Fight for Veterans' Mental Health
by Frances Andrew,
Assistant Director of Legislative Affairs
NMHA is seriously concerned about the Veterans Administration's failure
to adequately address the medical needs of the 650,000 veterans who have
a chronic mental illness. Unfortunately, many of these veterans are unable
to receive the mental health and substance abuse treatment that they need
and deserve due to the recent restructuring of the Veteran's Health Administration
(VHA). This year, due to our efforts, the House has approved a $18.3 billion
veterans' health program, and the Senate has approved a $19 billion program
(both were increased $1.7 billion from last year).
With the restructuring of the VHA, the number of inpatient psychiatric
beds has been cut drastically, as the VA attempts to shift towards more
outpatient care. We are particularly concerned that dollars saved by eliminating
beds from inpatient psychiatric facilities are not being redirected to
maintain capacity and to serve veterans with mental illness in the community;
this is a breach of the Public Law 104-262.
Currently, there is no indication that the twenty-two regional Veteran's
Integrated Service Networks (VISN's) are compensating for the lack of
inpatient care with either adequate alternative care settings or community-based
services for veterans with mental illness. Between FY96 and FY97 alone,
these cuts totaled $64 million. As a result of these cuts, 15,000-30,000
veterans with serious mental illness are not receiving the services that
they need.
The VHA lacks the tracking system to be able to assess the effects of
discharging seriously mentally ill veterans from inpatient and long-term
care beds. In addition, the VHA has not produced thorough outcome measures
for mental healthcare, nor for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, since the
regional VISN system was implemented in 1995.
Frighteningly, less than 40% of community-based outpatient clinics offer
even basic mental health services, and over 2/3 of the VHA's facilities
do not have case management services. Case management is essential for
mentally ill veterans because of the lack of financial and family support
within this demographic group. In addition, many members of this group
need continued attention because they suffer from the dual diagnoses of
mental illness and substance abuse. NMHA is taking the necessary steps
on the federal level to end the poor treatment of veterans with mental
illnesses.
NMHA has been successful in getting our own mental health legislative
provisions in the House and Senate Appropriations bills. These provisions
would allow more community-based outpatient clinics, expansion of case
management, and would require each VISN director to produce a report regarding
the redistribution of those dollars which were saved by the decrease in
inpatient psychiatric beds in VA hospitals. The community-based outpatient
clinics would be modeled after the Intensive Psychiatric Community Care
which is already in use and proven to be cost effective.
Both the House and Senate committees are urging the VA to provide case
management for veterans who are diagnosed as chronically mentally ill
similar to those case management programs financed in the public mental
health systems (particularly in New Jersey, Kentucky, and Iowa). NMHA
is still trying to get $64 million appropriated for case management programs.
Both the House and the Senate bills have language in them requesting a
comprehensive report which should include the number of patients receiving
treatment for mental illnesses at each medical center. We were also successful
in including specific improvements to several VISN's which had little
to offer mentally ill veterans. Finally, the House language has a provision
which requires the VISN's to increase the availability of the latest psychotropic
medications for mentally ill veterans.
We have been urging legislators not to forget the men and women to whom
our Nation owes a great debt. Veterans have risked their lives to protect
our country and values; and their sacrifice has left us with a moral obligation
to provide the best care available.
NMHA applauds several members of Congress, especially Senators Ted Stevens,
Robert Byrd, Christopher Bond, Tom Harkin, John Rockefeller, Jon Kyl,
Olympia Snowe and Representatives Bill Young, James Walsh, Marcy Kaptur,
Alan Mollohan, Rodney Frelinguysen, Anne Meagher Northup, Carrie Meek,
John Sununu, David Price and David Hobson for their overwhelming support
in the fight for better mental health treatment for veterans. For further
information, please contact Frances Andrew at (703) 838-7530 or by e-mail
at fandrew@nmha.org.
New
NMHA Values Embrace Cultural Competence
by Judy Leaver,
NMHA Vice-President for Constituency Building
The National Mental Health Association has launched a multi-year initiative
to increase the organization's cultural competence at the national, state
and local levels. A task force on diversity was convened by the NMHA Board
of Directors in 1998, and it has produced a Cultural Competency Planning
guide to assist Mental Health Associations (MHA's) throughout the country.
This effort is driven by the reality of rapidly changing demographics
that require nonprofit groups to move aggressively to reflect the communities
they serve. Organizations that fail to do so risk becoming irrelevant.
This means that boards, volunteers and staff should be representative
of diverse groups in their communities.
The NMHA task force determined that cultural competence more inclusively
reflects the goals of the organization than does diversity. NMHA's statement
of cultural competence includes race, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation,
gender, social groups and disabilities. As the organization moves toward
its goal of cultural competence, NMHA values demand that consumer/survivors
be significantly represented on boards, staff and in volunteer pools of
MHA's, making real the phrase "nothing about us without us."
Diversity is imbedded in the goal of cultural competence, but it is just
one component. Accepting and understanding differences in customs, mores
and patterns of thinking in other cultures are tangible ways in which
diversity is valued. NMHA and its affiliates are working toward becoming
a system that responds to the unique needs of populations whose cultures
are different from that which is currently dominant or mainstream in America.
Mainstream America will very shortly look quite different than it does
now, providing the major impetus for organizations and systems to become
culturally competent. For example, Asian and Pacific Islanders are the
fastest growing segment of the United States population and will reach
12 million by the year 2000. In 2005, ethnic minorities will account for
47% of the nation's population. 85% of those entering the work force will
be women, people of color and immigrants. Non-Latino whites, presently
75% of all Americans, will shrink to a bare majority by 2050.
What can nonprofit agencies do to become culturally competent? A useful
place to begin is an organizational assessment of current cultural competence.
The NMHA Cultural Competency Planning Guide includes both a survey and
a competence curriculum for use in evaluating any organization's current
status.
The next important step is the development of a values statement on cultural
competence. Ongoing discussion regarding individual and agency values
will help shape a workable statement. There are many published examples
of such statements that the TA Center can provide for interested groups.
NMHA has adapted fourteen guiding principles from the Center for Mental
Health Services to provide a context for becoming more culturally competent.
These principles undergird our organizational goals and recommendations
and also provide a framework for what to advocate for in a culturally
competent service system.
Over the next three years, NMHA will provide regular trainings on cultural
competence to assist MHA's to prepare them for this new requirement in
the reaffiliation process beginning in 2002. Any interested consumer supporter
organization may obtain a free copy of the Cultural Competency Planning
Guide by contacting Tracie Turner at 703-838-7554 or by e-mail at tturner@nmha.org.
NCSTAC
Promotes Minorities and Women
by Catherine
Huynh, NCSTAC Director
There is ample evidence that cultural differences among ethnic minorities
inhibit access to mental health care. Cultural barriers common to many
ethnic groups include language barriers, a cultural heritage which makes
use of different treatment methods, and systemic prejudices manifested
by health professionals. In addition, each ethnic group encounters system
barriers unique to their culture. Successful treatment of minorities with
mental health problems depends upon an understanding of the consumer's
sociocultural setting.
Women with mental illness also face a range of treatment barriers that
the current service system does not have the capacity to address. Traditionally,
service providers overlook women's responsibilities to home and children,
including planning for pregnancy, pre-natal care, impacts of psychotropic
drugs during pregnancy and following childbirth, parental rights, child
placement in foster or related types of care, basic parenting skills,
and unplanned parental psychiatric hospitalization experiences. These
particular needs and concerns affect women's ability to seek mental health
treatment.
Consumer supporter organizations must change mental health services to
increase service utilization by women and to accommodate individuals from
diverse cultures. These are difficult tasks that require hard work, dedication,
and a commitment to organizational transformation, yet these changes are
necessary in order to elicit the most effective responses and outcomes.
The National Consumer Supporter Technical Assistance Center seeks applicants
for start-up grants of $5,000 to go to ten consumer supporter organizations
to address cultural competence issues in mental health care for ethnic
minorities and women. Successful proposals will form local, regional,
or statewide coalitions with service providers and/or agencies with diverse
groups of mental health stakeholders to address these issues. In turn,
these sites will become study sites.
Additional information and application forms are available on-line at
www.nmha.org/ncstac or by contacting the TA Center at (800) 969-6642 or
by email at consumerta@nmha.org.
Applications must be received by Friday, January 14th, 2000.
National
Voter Empowerment Training Registration
If you are interested
in promoting voter empowerment, either by providing further training or
by registering and educating voters, please answer the questions below
and send your responses Beth Schaar at consumerta@nmha.org
or, by fax, at (703) 684-5968.
1) Name and address of your consumer supporter organization. Your title
within the organization:
2) Why are you interested in training consumer supporter groups in voter
empowerment
or
why are you interested in launching a voter outreach campaign?
3) Describe your plans to work in cooperation with other consumer supporter
organizations.
4) Describe your organizational capacity. Do you have a computer to house
a registrant database? How much staff can you devote to this project?
Consumer
Involvement Survey
Promoting consumer
involvement…
NCSTAC is gathering information for a special publication on consumer
involvement. Please help us by sharing your stories:
How have you tried to increase consumer involvement in your organization?
What strategies have you found particularly successful?
What problems have you encountered?
Please forward your comments to Beth Schaar at consumerta@nmha.org
or, by fax, at (703) 684-5968.